In Which the Happy Moron Explores Complexity

May 15, 2009 under technical, tongueincheek

I know! I’ll:

  • Combine all the colours in the world to make one fantastic supercolour which is brighter than all others before!
  • Combine all the flavours in the world to make one fantastic superflavour which is tastier than all others before!
  • Combine all the authors in the world to make one fantastic superauthor who writes better than all others before!
  • Combine all the committees in the world to make one fantastic supercommittee which is wiser than all others before!
  • Combine all the religions in the world to make one fantastic superreligion which is more truthful than all others before!
  • Combine all the programming language techniques in the world to make one fantastic superlanguage which is more powerful than all others before! (I will call it perl)
  • Combine all the programming frameworks in the world to make one fantastic superframework which is more extensible than all others before! (I will call it EJB 2.o)

What’s the common theme?

comments: 0 » tags: , ,

PostSecret

May 13, 2009 under personalinthepubliceye

I remember the day when PostSecret lost its lustre.

It wasn’t heralded with golden trumpets or fanfare. It wasn’t marked by catastrophe or trauma or excitement. It was, fitting for a day of lost lustre, almost entirely unremarkable. I went to the site and realized… that I didn’t want to visit it anymore.

The magic, if magic it was, had gone.

Living in the changed world of after, it’s hard to describe how things were before.

PostSecret was raw. It was real; it was honest. It was a refusal to deny those things taboo. PostSecret was a statement of human identity: “This is who we are.”. PostSecret was a chance to acknowledge the truth (good and bad), setting aside the fear of judgement. It was simple, eloquent and sincere.

And on the day it changed, it was still all those things, but it wasn’t the same for me.

I didn’t want another statement of identity; I didn’t want another eloquent problem description. “This is Scott; this is my secret; this is my shame.” I knew who I was. I knew what my shame was. PostSecret could bring some solace – “I understand how you feel; I feel the same way” – but it couldn’t take anything away.

It could tell me, “Here you are, this is you.” but it couldn’t answer the question, “Yes, and what do I do about it? This is the truth, how do I change it?”

There’s value in a good problem description. Often we carry answers with us, and the only thing we lack is the understanding of the problem we face. But a clear description is not all that a question needs. It needs an answer.

Here is PostSecret
. It may have something to say to you, but I don’t think I’ll be going back.

comments: Closed tags: ,

Guess the meaning…

May 12, 2009 under tongueincheek


Ok folks, here’s the game. I post the business phrase and you guess what it means.

Ready… Set… Go!

“Virtual co-location has been partially implemented.”

comments: 1 » tags: ,

The Princess

May 11, 2009 under curios

I’m trying out a little game I thought up. The game is to retell a fairy tale or children’s story while omitting one of the major characters. It might make a passable party game.

This story would be, “The Princess and the Frog” but our poor frog is the game’s first victim. Without further ado…

The Princess

In a kingdom far away there lived a princess. She was beautiful and well mannered and everything else that a princess should be. But she lacked a husband, and although she had many suitors, she rejected them all.

The princess was waiting for a frog. As a little girl, she had heard stories of frogs that were really princes under enchantment who, when kissed, would regain their true form.
“Such a prince for me” said the princess, “or none at all.”

And so she would spend many hours each day walking through the castle gardens, looking in the damp and cool places for her frog-prince.
But no frog-prince came, because frog-princes don’t exactly grow on trees.

The King and Queen, who had once thought her obsession adorable, became concerned as the princess rejected suitor after suitor. She was showing no signs of outgrowing her obsession, although she had given up kissing every frog on sight, adopting instead the strategy of trying to talk to them first.

“She’s getting smarter.” the Queen sighed to the King. “But no wiser.”

So the King summoned his advisors: his Minister, his Wizard and his Knight. He begged them for ideas about how to dredge up a suitable Prince.

“Have you considered Asia?” mused the Minister.
“King Frederick is open to influence.” suggested the Wizard.
“King Frederick is a sissy.” stated the Knight.

“You’ve done an excellent job of prioritizing strategic objectives on both a macro and micro scale.” pronounced the King’s Business Consultant.
“However you need to establish a mission statement going forward. Your brand has been diluted and you should reassess your core competencies.”

No one knew *why* the Business Consultant was there. He’d just managed to make himself appear without ever really being invited.

“Idiot.” spat the Minister.
“Who invited you?” demanded the Wizard.
“Shall I remove him, sire?” asked the Knight.
“I just want to know what he said.” pleaded the king.

“He said that you should send a delegation to Asia.” said the Minister.
“He said that you should talk to King Frederick” said the Wizard.
“He said that you should *conquer* King Frederick and force a marriage with his son” said the Knight.

“Oh, I don’t know.” said the king. “It sounded to *me* like he said that I should replace all my advisors. I’ll summon the executioner right away.”

The advisors were spared only by the Queen’s arrival. She told the King not to be silly, and that what the situation needed was a woman’s touch.
“A mother knows.” claimed the Queen. “I’ll talk to her.”
The King agreed to let the Queen talk to the princess that evening. He then proclaimed that he would summon his advisors on the morrow and execute them if they could not provide a solution.

The advisors fled to a nearby tavern.
“I don’t think there’s a prince in any country, anywhere, that can make that girl happy.” moaned the Minister.
“Don’t look at the ancient bachelor.” quipped the Wizard.
“Armies can’t help with romance.” shrugged the Knight.
“I’ve seen this before.” said the Business Consultant. “It’s a classic case of failing to manage customer expectations.”
“It’s time to rebrand, restructure and repurpose. We need to leverage amphibian resources.”

At this, the other advisors turned and stared at him.
“You know,” said the Wizard, “you could be a smart guy if you learned to speak English.”

The Queen’s talk failed miserably and the next morning the advisors presented their plan to the King.
“If the Princess only wants a frog-prince,” they said, “perhaps the answer is to give her a frog-prince.”
“They don’t exactly grow on trees!” the king exclaimed.

“Leave that to us, sire. We have a plan.”

Some months later, while strolling throught the garden, the Princess was surprised to encounter a prince sitting on a bench there.
“Who are you?” she cried. “What are you doing here?”
“I’m a prince.” he said. “I’m sitting on a bench.”
“Is this one of my Father’s jokes? No offense, but I’ve no use for princes, only frogs.”
“That’s unfortunate, because I’m not a frog any more. Well, best of luck.”
The prince got up to leave.
“Wait! Were you really a frog?” The Princess frowned. “You can’t have been, or else you’d have married the princess who kissed you!”
“Well, I was, and I would have. But the wedding was called off after my Father got drunk and called the bride’s mother a fat goat, among other things. Now I roam from kingdom to kingdom, looking for a bride. Apparently everyone wants either a proper prince or an unkissed frog. No-one
wants to marry an ex-amphibian. Good luck to you, though.”
With that, the prince sauntered off.
She was about to walk away when she noticed that there was a rose laying on the bench the prince had vacated. Had he left it there?
The Princess stood and pondered the question of whether or not a post-frog prince counted as a frog-prince.
“Close enough.” said the Princess.
The garden was absolutely full of roses, but the Princess picked this one up and pinned it to her dress.

That night the bleary-eyed Princess sat pouring over a book on magic. She’d had the terrifying thought that she couldn’t marry a frog-prince whom she herself had not restored. Did it really matter *which* princess had done the kissing?
Then she remembered the easy, confident manner with which the prince had carried himself in the garden.
“Close enough.” mumbled the Princess. She closed the book and staggered off to bed.

The King and Queen greatly rejoiced when the Princess announced that she had found an acceptible suitor. With the prince’s consent, they scheduled a wedding for the earliest possible date.

The night before the wedding, the Princess couldn’t sleep. She had thought that she had rid herself of all her doubts and concerns, but there was still a little shred of doubt, a linkgering whisper that she couldn’t silence. Could she marry an ex-frog prince?
Her thoughts were interrupted by a rustling ouside her room. She went out to see the prince scaling her balcony.
“What are you doing?” hissed the princess.
“I needed to talk to you.” said the prince. “There’s something I have to tell you.”
“Couldn’t it wait until the morning? asked the princess.
“No,” said the prince. “I don’t think that I’d be able to tell you in the morning, with all the people and the crowds and everything…”
“I’m not a frog-prince.” he continued. I’ve never been a frog, and I don’t think I ever will be one. But keeping it a secret is chewing me up inside, and I can’t marry you under false pretenses. The truth is, I’m King Frederick’s son. A delegation of your father’s advisors came and convinced King Frederick to send me here to marry you.”
“Oh.” said the princess. She didn’t feel that she could say much else. The prince and the princess stood looking at each other for a very long time, neither of them saying anything. Finally King Frederick’s son broke the silence, and his voice was very quiet.
“If you don’t want to marry me, I understand. I wish I could turn into a frog for you, but I can’t because I’m only a prince. But there is one thing I can do.”
The princess looked away from the balcony tiling and up at the prince.
“If you give me a kiss tonight, tomorrow I promise I’ll turn into your husband.”

The princess turned away from the prince and walked over to the edge of the balcony. Then her hands started to shake, because she suddenly remembered that she lived at the very top of the tallest tower, and realized that the prince had scaled ninety feet of sheer rock wall to reach *her* balcony.

She looked back at the prince, and then she went over to him and gave him a kiss that she would never have dreamed of giving to a frog.

“Now get out of here.” said the princess. “This time, take the stairs.”

When the princess closed the door behind him she realized that, not just her hands, but that all of her was shaking.
“I’d say that’s definitely better than close enough.” said the princess, and went to bed.

comments: 2 » tags: , ,

Sensibility Prevails

May 8, 2009 under curios, tongueincheek

In Germany, where a court rules that you can’t have more that a two-part hyphenated surname.

I’ve always looked suspiciously at the trend of married couples retaining both surnames. My programmer’s mind says, “That’s simply not extensible.” Sure, I see it as an offense to marital unity, but it also fails miserably from a practical perspective.

What happens when a Billingsworth-Hill marries a Watford-Smythe?

In Germany, at least, someone *does* think of the children.

comments: 3 » tags: ,

2 Corinthians

May 8, 2009 under 396wordBible

Spiritual life is Christ in us.

Index

comments: 0 » tags:

Deuteronomy

May 7, 2009 under 396wordBible

“Israel, love the LORD your God.”

Index

comments: 0 » tags:

Cogs in a Machine – Accountability

May 6, 2009 under thehumancondition, theology

How do we simple people live in a world full of complex systems? It’s one of the challenges I face personally – everywhere I look, I see complexity, much of it needless. This is a look at just one aspect of complexity in modern life.

The Old Testament is full of brutality and death. If it didn’t have God in it (actually He has quite a cameo :-P ), I might be tempted to agree with Hobbes that life is nasty, brutish and short.

Take, for example, the stonings.

If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: 19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; 20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. 21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear. Deut 21:18-21 (KJV)

Yikes! Just…Yikes!

Let’s talk about something else, shall we? How about a story about tech support?

I had the glorious experience of phoning a tech support line the other day. It didn’t solve my problem. They bounced me from support to tech support to advanced tech support before saying, “We’ll send someone out.” Hey, at least I got to talk to a person.

I get frustrated (okay, angry) dealing with modern customer service divisions, because I have the overwhelming feeling that they can’t do a darn thing. In a retail store, for instance, the clerk at the counter (I know, I’ve been the clerk) has a manager with a division manager who has a manager at Corporate who might be able to do something if he wasn’t doing more important stuff.

There’s no effective feedback mechanism designed into the system. Many corporate systems quietly and organically evolve into systems without effective customer feedback mechanisms, because such mechanisms are painful and inevitably require change. (If feedback doesn’t lead to change, it’s pointless feedback, and you’re better off ignoring it.)

It’s an approach which is immature, short-sighted and common. It could never happen in a small system (unless Mom-and-Pop are simply jerks) but it gets easily lost in the shuffle of a complex one.

Our man in Corporate is well removed from the pain of an angry customer. He doesn’t want to endure the kerfuffle at the counter of Store 413. He wants to format his reports. He’s like me.

Maybe I shouldn’t throw stones. Or… maybe I should.

My country is full of thieves, crooks, killers, rapists, liars, drunkards and neighbors whose cats defecate in my flower beds. And guess what? I don’t care. When I meet one, I just call the police. There’s a complex system designed just to deal with all of these kinds of people. It buffers me and protects me from the pain of an inconvenient truth. There’s a police officer and a lawyer and a judge and a jailer, all there to keep me safe. Yay complex systems!

And what exactly happens when we citizens believe that we don’t have to care about justice because we have a system to do it for us? What happens when we delegate our burden of responsibility? Do the cops get fed up with “taking out the trash” and learn how to do it aggressively, brutally and with injustice? Do they take out the angst of a thankless job on the accused?

Deuteronomy has something to say about that.

I don’t know whether capital punishment is right or wrong. But I know one thing, the way it was required in the Old Testament was not easy. Justice wasn’t abstracted away behind a complex system – it was a community activity.

Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him…
The accusers: Father and Mother.
…they shall say unto the elders of his city…
The judges: The community elders, judging with the law given by God
all the men of his city shall stone him…
The executioners: You. Me.

Could I execute someone? What would it take for me to throw a stone at someone’s head with the intent to kill them? It’s not something that I like to think about. But I can say this…

I’d have to be sure that I was doing the right thing. Taking personal responsibility for someone’s execution adds a whole new dimension to ‘falsely accused’. I would demand certainty that the punishment matched the crime and that the accused was guilty. If a man’s blood was to be on my hands, I’d want to know beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty, and that he deserved it.

Complex systems make accountability a harder task because it becomes oh so easy to pass the buck. Accountability has to be explicitly designed into systems and, once designed in, protected. Otherwise it goes away and human nature takes over. Ugliness is a part of the world we live in, and if a stoning is ugly, well…

so is a complex system which lacks accountability and compassion. I can tell you which of the two kills more often, and with less remorse.

I drafted this before I posted on this story. Being charged with executing God’s judgment means that you have to answer to God for either doing so or not doing so. God is the judge. If it’s a judgment he didn’t ordain, then it’s murder of the innocent and won’t be overlooked.

Ruth

May 6, 2009 under 396wordBible

A dignity above status is redeemed.

Index

comments: 0 » tags:

1 Kings

May 5, 2009 under 396wordBible

Human leadership produces predictably human results.

Index

comments: 0 » tags: