What a conversation!

January 30, 2009 under curios, metablogging

The internet brings together minds from across the globe.

If you want to observe a flame war with a “stage parent”, look no further.

Here are person who, though human, are alien to me. Fascinating. The internet lets me eavesdrop on people who I don’t understand, not even a little bit. What twists and turns of life could possibly have shaped these people into the curious figures they are?

comments: 1 » tags:

Poor wealthy America

January 28, 2009 under curios

Is suffering from a lack of largesse.

Making obscene amounts of money by selling foolish stuff is foolish.

I think I’m going to go be a plumber.

comments: 0 » tags:

Writing Recipes – II

January 28, 2009 under technical

Just a little while ago, I asked what kind of language recipes were written in. Wikipedia tells us that a language is all about its symbols and its grammar; the little fiddly bits and how we put them together.

Therefore, when looking at a “Recipe Language,” it makes to think a little bit about the rules that apply, and the bits that they apply to.

In the same way that you can look at an English composition and say, “That is a good composition,” or “That is correct English”, you can also look at a recipe and say, “That is a good recipe,” or “That is a valid recipe.”

The rules are not the same rules which apply in English. In recipes, you’re allowed to ignore definite articles (“Mix flour with water”). A bulleted list of ingredients is expected in a recipe. If you wrote out the English equivalent, “The following ingredients are required: one teaspoon of vanilla extract, one quarter-teaspoon of salt, one large onion, 12 cloves of garlic, two cups of sugar and one package of bacon,” not only would it taste… special,  but people would look at the recipe with a quirked eyebrow.

They would accept it as a valid recipe, but they would prefer the standard bullet list of ingredients.

In English, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with “Grill parsley for 15 minutes or until it turns black” as an imperative. It’s perfectly correct. In a recipe, however, it labours under additional constraints.

In a recipe, you can’t talk about ingredients which haven’t been listed. If you write a recipe which includes the instruction, “Grill parsley 15min or until black” and you’ve only included bacon, sugar, garlic and onion in your ingredients,  it’s not a correct recipe. In a recipe, you can’t use all possible words, all the time. There are rules which govern when you can talk about parsley.

So what exactly makes a recipe so big and mighty that it can limit what I can talk about?

comments: 0 » tags:

Douglas Adams on the Internet.

January 27, 2009 under metablogging

One of the most important things you learn from the internet is that there is no *them* out there. It’s just an awful lot of *us*.

Read the whole piece; what blows me away is that he wrote that in 1999.

(This isn’t a new thing, the new thing is that I’m discovering it. Maybe you will too. ;-)

comments: 0 » tags:

Writing recipes – I

January 26, 2009 under technical

This is a long discussion that I’m going to try splitting up over blog posts.
But first…. Cookery!

Chinese Potato Salad

Ingredients
  • 5-6 medium potatoes (about 2 1/2 pounds)
  • 4 slices bacon, well-cooked and crumbled
  • 3/4 cup chopped bok choy
  • 1 red pepper, diced
  • 1/2 cup chopped green onion
  • 1/4 cup chopped celantro
Sauce
  • 1 1/3 cup mayonnaise
  • 1 tsp sugar
  • 1 tbs soy sauce
  • 1-2 tsp sesame oil
  • 1/8-1/4 tsp hot mustard powder
  • 1/8 tsp salt

Boil the potatoes until cooked but still firm. Cut into potatosalad-sized chunks. Mix the ingredients for the sauce together,using more or less sesame oil and host mustard according to taste (the more the better, up to a point...). Put all solid ingredients together in a large bowl, then add the sauce and mix well. Chill.

Ajvar

Yield: 6 servings

  • 2 lg Eggplants
  • 6 lg Red or green sweet peppers
  • Salt
  • Pepper
  • 1 Garlic clove; minced
  • 1 Lemon; juiced
  • 1/2 c Oil, preferably olive oil
  • Parsley; minced

Bake eggplants and sweet peppers at 350 F until tender when pierced with a fork. Peel skin from hot vegetables and chop or mince the vegetables.Season to taste with salt and pepper and stir in the garlic and lemon juice. Gradually stir in as much of the oil as the vegetables will absorb. Mix well. Pile into a glass dish and sprinkle with parsley.

Boy, do I ever feel fancy, me and my blog posting of foreign recipes I stole from the internet. But I’m a sham; I haven’t tried making them, because I’m not really after them for the food. I’m after them for their language .
My question is, “Are these recipes written in English?”

My first reaction is, “Of course! If they weren’t, my sorry monolingual self wouldn’t be able to read them!”

But taking a closer look, I’m not certain that they are, in fact, I’m certain that they are not written in English. I have several convincing arguments. In English, lists of things, like frogs, trees, books or bloggers, are separated by commas (as I have just demonstrated). In English, “1 Garlic clove; minced”does not compute. Some of the words don’t seem to be real words. What is a ‘c’? A ‘tsp’? A ‘tbs’? An ‘lg’?

Even the most Englishlike bit isn’t really English. If it were English, shouldn’t “Bake eggplants” be “Bake the eggplants”? I’d write this off as a typo, except that it occurs all over the place.

Certainly the words used are all English words (or abbreviations thereof), and this should be enough to qualify a recipe as “English” for an “It’s not in French” definition of English. Perhaps the conclusion I should come to is that a recipe isn’t written in any kind of natural language.

If that’s the case, what kind of language is it written in?

comments: 0 » tags:

The Long Tail

January 26, 2009 under metablogging

Here’s why the Happy Moron will likely never be popular.

I’m okay with that, the value of the Happy Moron lies in the experience, not the product.

comments: 0 » tags:

I just got suckered.

January 23, 2009 under Uncategorized

I feel vaguely unclean.

I never post on Slashdot. It’s just not worth it. There are too many voices screaming for any conversation to emerge. Too many posters are on a mad dash to accumulate virtual glory and distinction. Adding to the clamour is vanity, nothing more.

But when I saw this post, something popped. It snapped, it just… went.

It was this moment.

The only thing which can calm my conscience is the hope that maybe they weren’t really trolling. Maybe they were just genuinely the wrongest person on the internet (and arrogant to boot). There’s something about someone stating that, “Black is white, and if you don’t realize that you don’t know anything about programming.” which will make the mildest geek’s blood boil with righteous indignation.

Maybe they will see the light.

I couldn’t help myself. I felt the flamer’s rage and I let it consume me. As the waves of blinding fire engulfed me it felt good; it felt right. I was doing something for the cause of the just; I was answering my call.

And now… Emptiness. A sense of futility and regret. The knowledge of having done… a shameful thing. Somehow, I am less than I was; I despise myself and the object of my passion. I want to hide, to run, to make the memory go away, to say it never happened.

comments: 0 » tags: ,

A sign of the times…

January 21, 2009 under curios

Manchester United loses its shirt sponsor.

This story says something about human nature. The core of this story is a message about largesse.

You could argue that for AIG, a shirt sponsorship with Manchester United is either a good business decision or a bad one. It either pays for itself or it doesn’t. More importantly, it is either more profitable than the next best investment idea they have, or it isn’t.

In my tiny layperson’s brain, I can’t understand what fluctuating economic factors could have scuppered the value of an advertising deal. Scuppered the deal itself, sure. But scuppered the value of it?

If it was a smart thing before, it’s probably still a smart thing. Even if the value of the deal has decreased, there’s still the option of sitting at the bargaining table and negotiating a reasonable price based on these times. Surely it was the best possible business decision all along? No, I’m pointing the finger directly at largesse. I know, you’re thinking, “Who would ever accuse bankers of living large?” but I assure you, there’s more than cold business sense going on behind the ManU shirt deal.

You know that somewhere on the links, two banker buddies were chatting…

“I’ve got Manchester United. Who’ve you got?”

When times get tough, largesse is the first thing to go.

comments: Closed tags: ,

Inevitable

January 18, 2009 under poetry

People who say,
“Hasn’t failed me yet!”
Can often be found
Playing Russian roulette.

comments: 0 » tags:

Yech

January 16, 2009 under curios, technical

Articles like this leave a bad taste in my mouth.

I’m trying to find put my finger on why this bothers me so much, but words just can’t describe my distaste for it. If you want to peg people into little cubes in a bigger cube, go ahead, but leave me out of it.

I’m also doing my utmost to refrain from mocking the comments on the original article . Painful.

comments: 1 »